Who will be found for the children?
Written by John Howard, this excerpt delivers a powerful indictment of the Church’s silence in the face of injustice. Drawing from history and Scripture, it calls believers to be the salt and light, challenging them to stand against the slaughter of the unborn with the same conviction as those who opposed slavery.
From Democide to Ecclesiocide: The Church’s Silent Complicity in Modern Mass Murder
I have coined a new term: Ecclesiocide—Death by Church. It is the silent complicity of the modern Church, which stands by in apathy while millions of innocent lives are slaughtered, refusing to lift its voice against the bloodshed.
A Woman’s Right to Choose… What, Exactly?
"A Woman’s Right to Choose…" is never a complete sentence—because finishing it would expose the horrific truth. The so-called choice is nothing less than the sanctioned killing of an innocent child, stripped of their most fundamental right: the right to live.
A Satirical Apology to the Pastors of Connecticut
With 2,600 pastors in Connecticut, at least two—yes, a staggering 0.08%—are actively preaching against abortion both from the pulpit and at the abortion clinics. Clearly, the Church is leading the charge in abolishing abortion!
Wake Up, Church of Connecticut!
Abortion exists in Connecticut because of the passivity of Christians, pastors, and churches. Until the Church wakes up and stands up, abortion will not be abolished.
An Open Letter to Jennie Bradley Lichter, President-elect, March for Life
So I must ask: What does it mean to “protect” a mother who willingly commits the death of her child? Does it mean protecting her from feeling guilty, protecting her because she is the other victim in abortion, or protecting her due to a supposed lack of education?
Opposition to Senate Joint Resolution No. 35: A Call to Uphold Justice and Protect the Unborn
Senate Joint Resolution No. 35 is not a step toward justice but a codification of legalized murder, enshrining the slaughter of our unborn Posterity under the guise of 'equal protection.' Just as history has condemned those who denied the humanity of slaves and Holocaust victims, so too will it judge those who pass iniquitous decrees to justify the killing of innocent children—repent before it is too late.
The Guilt of Abortion: A Biblical Reality That Cannot Be Denied
Abolitionists are hated because we expose real guilt—the guilt of the Church, pastors, and Christians who have allowed abortion to continue through their silence, indifference, and compromise. Instead of repenting, many suppress their guilt, justify their inaction, or attack those who confront them, but the only true way to deal with guilt—personal and corporate—is through repentance, confession, and turning to Christ.
The Spectrum of Compromise and the Only Righteous Path
Abolitionism is the only righteous response to the evil of abortion—there is no room for compromise, regulation, or half-measures when innocent lives are at stake. Just as light shines in the darkness, the unborn child is a creation of God, deserving full protection and justice, not political maneuvering.
The Onerous and Not Ironic Platform of Senator Paul Honig
Senator Paul Honig’s platform as The Pro-Choice Candidate endorses the legal slaughter of over 10,000 unborn children in Connecticut each year, with approximately 60% funded by taxpayers. Despite the pro-choice mantra that men should have no opinion on abortion, Honig’s leadership exposes the hypocrisy of a movement that silences opposition but welcomes men who champion the shedding of innocent blood.
An Open “Letter” to Former Senator Lisa Seminara
Former Senator Lisa Seminara spoke of advocating for the most vulnerable, yet during her tenure, she failed to defend the most innocent—the unborn children of Connecticut. True leadership demands boldness against injustice, not the political compromise that allows over 10,000 babies to be slaughtered each year.
Why Are Pro-Life Leaders Thrilled With RFK Jr. and Trump’s “Pro-Life” Stance?
Pro-life leaders are celebrating politicians who claim to oppose abortion while supporting 98% of its occurrences, proving once again that the movement is about regulating murder, not abolishing it. Until abortion is treated as the crime it is, the pro-life establishment will remain one of the greatest obstacles to true justice for the preborn.
How to Become Invisible: Join Your Local Abolitionist Society
Most people dream of being seen, but if you truly want to become invisible, just take a stand against the greatest evil of our time—abortion. The moment you confront it, you will fade from the sight of friends, pastors, and society, until the day they decide to see you—and then, they will hate you for it.
So You (Don’t) Want to Be an Abolitionist?
The greatest opposition to abolition has never just come from the world, but from within the Church itself—where silence, compromise, and accusations of being “too extreme†have long been weapons against those who confront evil. Yet, as history has shown, true love demands boldness, and justice requires the willingness to stand alone.
Part 6: Addressing Common Arguments and Providing Practical Responses
Justice transcends gender; speaking out against abortion is not about anatomy but about standing for universal truths that protect the most vulnerable among us.
Part 5: When Pro-Choice Men Speak, the Double Standard Emerges
Men advocating for abortion abolition play a critical role in amplifying the call for justice, proving that moral responsibility transcends gender.
Part 4: Men and the Moral Responsibility to Speak Against Injustice
Men bear a moral responsibility to stand against the injustice of abortion, as silence in the face of evil is complicity in its perpetuation.
Biblical Inconsistencies: Why the 'No Uterus, No Opinion' Argument Contradicts Scripture: Part 3
Scripture unequivocally calls for believers, men and women alike, to stand for truth and defend the innocent, dismantling the idea that only those with a uterus can speak on abortion.
Part 2: The Logical Fallacies in the "No Uterus, No Opinion" Argument
The "No Uterus, No Opinion" argument crumbles under scrutiny as it relies on logical fallacies like ad hominem attacks, appeals to authority, and inconsistent application, which obstruct meaningful dialogue on abortion ethics.