Biblical Inconsistencies: Why the 'No Uterus, No Opinion' Argument Contradicts Scripture: Part 3

In defending the abolition of abortion, Christians must address the flawed theological underpinnings of the "No Uterus, No Opinion" argument. This reasoning not only fails logically but also violates foundational biblical principles. As abortion abolitionists committed to the authority of Scripture, we must carefully examine how this claim contradicts God's Word and biblical justice. This is Part 3.

1. Biblical Principles of Speaking Truth

The Bible does not limit the proclamation of truth to specific genders or experiences. Scripture commands all believers to defend the oppressed and speak against injustice. Proverbs 31:8-9 states:
"Open thy mouth for the dumb in the cause of all such as are appointed to destruction. Open thy mouth, judge righteously, and plead the cause of the poor and needy."

This divine charge applies to every Christian, regardless of gender or personal experience. To claim that men cannot speak against abortion because they lack a uterus disregards this biblical mandate.

Equivalent Example: Imagine someone arguing that only those who have been imprisoned can advocate for prison reform. This would absurdly exclude Jesus Himself, who spoke about freeing captives yet was never confined in a literal jail before His death.

2. God’s Design of Leadership and Justice

Throughout Scripture, God calls men and women alike to address societal sin. Consider the examples of Moses and the prophets, many of whom spoke against practices they never personally experienced. Micah 6:8 teaches:
"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?"

Doing justice is not contingent on experiencing injustice firsthand. Men are called to protect the vulnerable, including unborn children, as a reflection of Christ’s sacrificial love for His bride, the Church.

3. The Role of Men in Protecting the Unborn

God’s design for humanity includes the complementary roles of men and women. While men do not bear children, they are called to be protectors and advocates for the vulnerable. Ephesians 5:25-28 instructs men to love sacrificially and lead with Christlike humility. Advocacy for the unborn aligns with this biblical responsibility.

Equivalent Example: Suggesting that men cannot advocate for unborn children because they lack a uterus is as nonsensical as claiming that women cannot discuss war or international policy because they are less represented in military leadership.

4. The Consistency of Moral Truth

The argument that men cannot speak on abortion because they cannot experience pregnancy undermines the consistency of moral truth. Abortion is not merely a personal issue; it is a matter of life and death, rooted in the universal moral law revealed by God. Psalm 139:13-16 reminds us:
"For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made."

God’s creation of life in the womb is not gender-specific—it is a universal truth. Men, as image-bearers of God, are equally responsible for upholding and defending this truth.

Conclusion

The Bible provides a clear and unequivocal basis for men to speak against abortion. To argue otherwise is to dismiss God’s call for His people to act as His ambassadors of truth and justice. Injustice is not gender-specific, nor is the call to defend those who cannot defend themselves. By relying on Scripture, Christians can boldly refute the "No Uterus, No Opinion" argument and stand firm in their role as advocates for the unborn.